Genetic experiments without true consent
A heated debate has erupted in Burkina Faso after it was discovered that the Target Malaria project, supported by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, had begun releasing genetically modified mosquitoes without fully informing local communities. The program, launched in 2012, aimed to reduct the population of female mosquitoes that carry the parasite. However, many civic associations denounced the lack of real consent: villagers involved in the project say they were not consulted before the trials began. This incident is yet another case where research funded by large Western foundations is conducted in Africa as if the land and its people were an open laboratory, without openly communicating or informing the community, especially about the risks.
The response from Burkina Faso’s government
The official reason cited “biosafety” and “protection of national sovereignty,” but the political message was clear: no more externally imposed experiments. President Ibrahim Traoré asserted the country’s right to decide what happens on its territory, especially when it comes to biotechnologies that may cause irreversible effects on ecosystems.
For the first time, an African government has dared to halt a project backed by one of the world’s most powerful foundations.
Medicine, resistance, and Africa taking charge of its health
The case of Burkina Faso highlights a broader issue: as major Western companies continue to develop increasingly powerful medications—often contributing to drug resistance—there exist African organizations that are already equipped to manufacture innovative and more sustainable medicines.
In Kenya, Universal Corporation Ltd. became the first company on the continent to receive WHO certification for an antimalarial drug. In Nigeria, the Swipha pharmaceutical company produced a medicine to protect pregnant women against malaria. These instances demonstrate that the development of independent and effective solutions is indeed feasible.
In this context, Burkina Faso’s decision is symbolic: it represents not merely a rejection of hazardous experiments, but an affirmation of scientific integrity and the political autonomy of the African continent—one that is able to address its own needs utilizing its own resources, developing local frameworks that honour communities without relying on external models that frequently generate more issues than they resolve.
Africa and Western stereotypes
During the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, many Western analysts and commentators anticipated a catastrophe for the African continent. However, these predictions turned out to be incorrect:
African healthcare systems, accustomed to managing epidemics such as Ebola and dengue fever, reacted swiftly and effectively—astonishing the Western world.
This underestimation reflects a lingering paternalistic perspective, which continues to perceive Africa as fragile and in need of assistance, while viewing the Western model as the only valid and superior approach—something that must be accepted uncritically.
In contrast, the response to COVID highlighted the capability and resilience of African health systems. This same spirit now motivates Burkina Faso’s decision: to reject externally imposed models and experiments — often masquerading as cooperation — that threaten local populations and their right to self-determination.
Kisedet’s activities are carried out by professionists who work every day to support the most vulnerable minors and their families.
You can contribute funding our activities and that’s why we present our solidarity shop!
The garments and items of the Afric’AMA collection are produced with the finest fabrics and from the work of Tanzanian seamstresses and tailors.
Kisedet has always guaranteed fair compensation with respect and dignity of work.
If you are interested in reading our articles and receiving updates on the activities carried out by Kisedet click the green button and subscribe to the newsletter!